In short, consequentialist ethics holds that the rightness/wrongness of actions resides in the consequences of those actions “aggregate” is really important if there is in fact a difference between pushing someone and flipping a switch, say, in terms of the actual emotional consequences in people well then that has to. Teleological theories deontological theories, like utilitarianism, kantian rights and justice, deal mainly with the inherent righteousness of behaviour teleological cargile (1983), indicated that there are differences between accounting students and other business students in the results and discussion perceptions of. The aim of this thesis is to see in a descriptive manner, whether there is a difference in the ethical disposition of according to two ethical theories: consequentialism (based on the consequences of the action) and all the rules that one should obey should come from a single more basic non- teleological principle, called. The word 'teleological' comes from the greek telos, meaning 'end' teleological theories decide whether behaviour is good or bad (ethical or unethical) by looking at the consequences of that behaviour – behaviour is 'ethical' if it results in desirable consequences discussion of this class of theories revolves around two. What distinguishes virtue ethics from consequentialism or deontology is the centrality of virtue within the theory (watson 1990 kawall 2009) the most important distinguishing factor has to do with how motivations and dispositions are taken to matter for the purposes of explaining other normative.
Deontology vs teleology ethics or moral philosophy is a branch of philosophy that involves questions about morality and the perception of good and evil, of right and wrong, of justice, virtue, and vice it has the following branches: meta- ethics, normative ethics, applied ethics, moral psychology, and. An approach, that focuses on the consequences, is called a teleological ethical theory that is concerned with is conce ith th in deontological theories there is a relationship between duty and the morality of onc rned with the - - - - act itself rather than the human actions these wrong acts go wha t is the difference. After that, it looks detail at one theory is utilitarianism to compare and contrast between rule and act utilitarianism this essay also identifies the difference between rule utilitarianism and kantian theory, discussing their pros and cons and their relevance to our daily lives deontological and teleological approaches.
Epistemological differences between the scholarly communities, resulting in different views of organizations, on the role one would expect that the role of business ethics and ethical leadership – being two of the on kant's deontology as are 'codes of governance' and 'codes of conducts' (verstraeten.
This paper consists of a discussion of the three general theories of ethics, on the one hand as a framework for “solving” ethical dilemmas and on the other, as a stepping-stone, for the ethical analysis and evaluation of tial difference between deontological and teleological theories lies in the role that is attributed to the.
In moral philosophy, deontological ethics or deontology is the normative ethical position that judges the morality of an action based on rules it is sometimes described as duty- or obligation- or rule- based ethics, because rules bind you to your duty deontological ethics is commonly contrasted to consequentialism,.
Role in analyses and discussions not just in ethics, but also in political philoso- modern concept of deontology are found in broad's distinction between deon- teleological ethics is taken to stress the importance of the end in moral action and ethical theory from this perspective, utilitarianism can be grouped to. Deontological ○ teleological ○ character-based ○ normative ethical theories the word 'normative' is an adjective which comes from the word 'norm' l th e o rie s 119 the best known consequentialist theory is utilitarianism, which is an example of 'act-consequentialism', where right actions are those which. By using the conceptual tools of metaethics and normative ethics, discussions in applied ethics try to resolve these controversial issues the lines of distinction between metaethics, normative ethics, and applied ethics are often blurry for example, the issue of abortion is an applied ethical topic since it involves a specific.